summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authoralk3pInjection <webmaster@raspii.tech>2024-02-04 16:16:35 +0800
committeralk3pInjection <webmaster@raspii.tech>2024-02-04 16:16:35 +0800
commitabdaadbcae30fe0c9a66c7516798279fdfd97750 (patch)
tree00a54a6e25601e43876d03c1a4a12a749d4a914c /share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html
Import stripped Arm GNU Toolchain 13.2.Rel1HEADumineko
https://developer.arm.com/downloads/-/arm-gnu-toolchain-downloads Change-Id: I7303388733328cd98ab9aa3c30236db67f2e9e9c
Diffstat (limited to 'share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html')
-rw-r--r--share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html241
1 files changed, 241 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html b/share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f7540de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/share/doc/gdb/Bug-Reporting.html
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
+<html>
+<!-- Copyright (C) 1988-2023 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
+under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
+any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with the
+Invariant Sections being "Free Software" and "Free Software Needs
+Free Documentation", with the Front-Cover Texts being "A GNU Manual,"
+and with the Back-Cover Texts as in (a) below.
+
+(a) The FSF's Back-Cover Text is: "You are free to copy and modify
+this GNU Manual. Buying copies from GNU Press supports the FSF in
+developing GNU and promoting software freedom." -->
+<!-- Created by GNU Texinfo 5.1, http://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo/ -->
+<head>
+<title>Debugging with GDB: Bug Reporting</title>
+
+<meta name="description" content="Debugging with GDB: Bug Reporting">
+<meta name="keywords" content="Debugging with GDB: Bug Reporting">
+<meta name="resource-type" content="document">
+<meta name="distribution" content="global">
+<meta name="Generator" content="makeinfo">
+<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
+<link href="index.html#Top" rel="start" title="Top">
+<link href="Concept-Index.html#Concept-Index" rel="index" title="Concept Index">
+<link href="index.html#SEC_Contents" rel="contents" title="Table of Contents">
+<link href="GDB-Bugs.html#GDB-Bugs" rel="up" title="GDB Bugs">
+<link href="Command-Line-Editing.html#Command-Line-Editing" rel="next" title="Command Line Editing">
+<link href="Bug-Criteria.html#Bug-Criteria" rel="previous" title="Bug Criteria">
+<style type="text/css">
+<!--
+a.summary-letter {text-decoration: none}
+blockquote.smallquotation {font-size: smaller}
+div.display {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.example {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.indentedblock {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.lisp {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.smalldisplay {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.smallexample {margin-left: 3.2em}
+div.smallindentedblock {margin-left: 3.2em; font-size: smaller}
+div.smalllisp {margin-left: 3.2em}
+kbd {font-style:oblique}
+pre.display {font-family: inherit}
+pre.format {font-family: inherit}
+pre.menu-comment {font-family: serif}
+pre.menu-preformatted {font-family: serif}
+pre.smalldisplay {font-family: inherit; font-size: smaller}
+pre.smallexample {font-size: smaller}
+pre.smallformat {font-family: inherit; font-size: smaller}
+pre.smalllisp {font-size: smaller}
+span.nocodebreak {white-space:nowrap}
+span.nolinebreak {white-space:nowrap}
+span.roman {font-family:serif; font-weight:normal}
+span.sansserif {font-family:sans-serif; font-weight:normal}
+ul.no-bullet {list-style: none}
+-->
+</style>
+
+
+</head>
+
+<body lang="en" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000" link="#0000FF" vlink="#800080" alink="#FF0000">
+<a name="Bug-Reporting"></a>
+<div class="header">
+<p>
+Previous: <a href="Bug-Criteria.html#Bug-Criteria" accesskey="p" rel="previous">Bug Criteria</a>, Up: <a href="GDB-Bugs.html#GDB-Bugs" accesskey="u" rel="up">GDB Bugs</a> &nbsp; [<a href="index.html#SEC_Contents" title="Table of contents" rel="contents">Contents</a>][<a href="Concept-Index.html#Concept-Index" title="Index" rel="index">Index</a>]</p>
+</div>
+<hr>
+<a name="How-to-Report-Bugs"></a>
+<h3 class="section">31.2 How to Report Bugs</h3>
+<a name="index-bug-reports"></a>
+<a name="index-GDB-bugs_002c-reporting"></a>
+
+<p>A number of companies and individuals offer support for <small>GNU</small> products.
+If you obtained <small>GDB</small> from a support organization, we recommend you
+contact that organization first.
+</p>
+<p>You can find contact information for many support companies and
+individuals in the file <samp>etc/SERVICE</samp> in the <small>GNU</small> Emacs
+distribution.
+</p>
+<p>In any event, we also recommend that you submit bug reports for
+<small>GDB</small> to <a href="https://bugs.linaro.org/">https://bugs.linaro.org/</a>.
+</p>
+<p>The fundamental principle of reporting bugs usefully is this:
+<strong>report all the facts</strong>. If you are not sure whether to state a
+fact or leave it out, state it!
+</p>
+<p>Often people omit facts because they think they know what causes the
+problem and assume that some details do not matter. Thus, you might
+assume that the name of the variable you use in an example does not matter.
+Well, probably it does not, but one cannot be sure. Perhaps the bug is a
+stray memory reference which happens to fetch from the location where that
+name is stored in memory; perhaps, if the name were different, the contents
+of that location would fool the debugger into doing the right thing despite
+the bug. Play it safe and give a specific, complete example. That is the
+easiest thing for you to do, and the most helpful.
+</p>
+<p>Keep in mind that the purpose of a bug report is to enable us to fix the
+bug. It may be that the bug has been reported previously, but neither
+you nor we can know that unless your bug report is complete and
+self-contained.
+</p>
+<p>Sometimes people give a few sketchy facts and ask, &ldquo;Does this ring a
+bell?&rdquo; Those bug reports are useless, and we urge everyone to
+<em>refuse to respond to them</em> except to chide the sender to report
+bugs properly.
+</p>
+<p>To enable us to fix the bug, you should include all these things:
+</p>
+<ul>
+<li> The version of <small>GDB</small>. <small>GDB</small> announces it if you start
+with no arguments; you can also print it at any time using <code>show
+version</code>.
+
+<p>Without this, we will not know whether there is any point in looking for
+the bug in the current version of <small>GDB</small>.
+</p>
+</li><li> The type of machine you are using, and the operating system name and
+version number.
+
+</li><li> The details of the <small>GDB</small> build-time configuration.
+<small>GDB</small> shows these details if you invoke it with the
+<samp>--configuration</samp> command-line option, or if you type
+<code>show configuration</code> at <small>GDB</small>&rsquo;s prompt.
+
+</li><li> What compiler (and its version) was used to compile <small>GDB</small>&mdash;e.g.
+&ldquo;gcc&ndash;2.8.1&rdquo;.
+
+</li><li> What compiler (and its version) was used to compile the program you are
+debugging&mdash;e.g. &ldquo;gcc&ndash;2.8.1&rdquo;, or &ldquo;HP92453-01 A.10.32.03 HP
+C Compiler&rdquo;. For <small>GCC</small>, you can say <kbd>gcc --version</kbd>
+to get this information; for other compilers, see the documentation for
+those compilers.
+
+</li><li> The command arguments you gave the compiler to compile your example and
+observe the bug. For example, did you use &lsquo;<samp>-O</samp>&rsquo;? To guarantee
+you will not omit something important, list them all. A copy of the
+Makefile (or the output from make) is sufficient.
+
+<p>If we were to try to guess the arguments, we would probably guess wrong
+and then we might not encounter the bug.
+</p>
+</li><li> A complete input script, and all necessary source files, that will
+reproduce the bug.
+
+</li><li> A description of what behavior you observe that you believe is
+incorrect. For example, &ldquo;It gets a fatal signal.&rdquo;
+
+<p>Of course, if the bug is that <small>GDB</small> gets a fatal signal, then we
+will certainly notice it. But if the bug is incorrect output, we might
+not notice unless it is glaringly wrong. You might as well not give us
+a chance to make a mistake.
+</p>
+<p>Even if the problem you experience is a fatal signal, you should still
+say so explicitly. Suppose something strange is going on, such as, your
+copy of <small>GDB</small> is out of synch, or you have encountered a bug in
+the C library on your system. (This has happened!) Your copy might
+crash and ours would not. If you told us to expect a crash, then when
+ours fails to crash, we would know that the bug was not happening for
+us. If you had not told us to expect a crash, then we would not be able
+to draw any conclusion from our observations.
+</p>
+<a name="index-script"></a>
+<a name="index-recording-a-session-script"></a>
+<p>To collect all this information, you can use a session recording program
+such as <code>script</code>, which is available on many Unix systems.
+Just run your <small>GDB</small> session inside <code>script</code> and then
+include the <samp>typescript</samp> file with your bug report.
+</p>
+<p>Another way to record a <small>GDB</small> session is to run <small>GDB</small>
+inside Emacs and then save the entire buffer to a file.
+</p>
+</li><li> If you wish to suggest changes to the <small>GDB</small> source, send us context
+diffs. If you even discuss something in the <small>GDB</small> source, refer to
+it by context, not by line number.
+
+<p>The line numbers in our development sources will not match those in your
+sources. Your line numbers would convey no useful information to us.
+</p>
+</li></ul>
+
+<p>Here are some things that are not necessary:
+</p>
+<ul>
+<li> A description of the envelope of the bug.
+
+<p>Often people who encounter a bug spend a lot of time investigating
+which changes to the input file will make the bug go away and which
+changes will not affect it.
+</p>
+<p>This is often time consuming and not very useful, because the way we
+will find the bug is by running a single example under the debugger
+with breakpoints, not by pure deduction from a series of examples.
+We recommend that you save your time for something else.
+</p>
+<p>Of course, if you can find a simpler example to report <em>instead</em>
+of the original one, that is a convenience for us. Errors in the
+output will be easier to spot, running under the debugger will take
+less time, and so on.
+</p>
+<p>However, simplification is not vital; if you do not want to do this,
+report the bug anyway and send us the entire test case you used.
+</p>
+</li><li> A patch for the bug.
+
+<p>A patch for the bug does help us if it is a good one. But do not omit
+the necessary information, such as the test case, on the assumption that
+a patch is all we need. We might see problems with your patch and decide
+to fix the problem another way, or we might not understand it at all.
+</p>
+<p>Sometimes with a program as complicated as <small>GDB</small> it is very hard to
+construct an example that will make the program follow a certain path
+through the code. If you do not send us the example, we will not be able
+to construct one, so we will not be able to verify that the bug is fixed.
+</p>
+<p>And if we cannot understand what bug you are trying to fix, or why your
+patch should be an improvement, we will not install it. A test case will
+help us to understand.
+</p>
+</li><li> A guess about what the bug is or what it depends on.
+
+<p>Such guesses are usually wrong. Even we cannot guess right about such
+things without first using the debugger to find the facts.
+</p></li></ul>
+
+
+
+
+
+<hr>
+<div class="header">
+<p>
+Previous: <a href="Bug-Criteria.html#Bug-Criteria" accesskey="p" rel="previous">Bug Criteria</a>, Up: <a href="GDB-Bugs.html#GDB-Bugs" accesskey="u" rel="up">GDB Bugs</a> &nbsp; [<a href="index.html#SEC_Contents" title="Table of contents" rel="contents">Contents</a>][<a href="Concept-Index.html#Concept-Index" title="Index" rel="index">Index</a>]</p>
+</div>
+
+
+
+</body>
+</html>