Update JSR166 tck tests.

The following tests have been omitted because they are
unsupported :

- Atomic8Test.java
- CompletableFutureTest.java
- ConcurrentHashMap8Test.java
- DoubleAccumulatorTest.java
- DoubleAdderTest.java
- ForkJoinPool8Test.java
- ForkJoinTask8Test.java
- LongAccumulatorTest.java
- LongAdderTest.java
- SplittableRandomTest.java
- StampedLockTest.java
- ThreadLocalRandom8Test.java
- ThreadPoolExecutor9Test.java

A package declaration has been added to all files (package jsr166;)
and the base-class JSR166Test has been changed not to rely on features
that aren't available on android / junit in the android environment.

We also avoid using junit4 style TestSuite declarations. While the CTS
test runner handles them properly usually, it trips over itself when it
encounters a failure and tries to run each test in an invidual process
and fails each test for no good reason (needs investigation on the CTS
side of things)

bug: 20628776

(cherry picked from commit 5da8b2b3cac51f0f592a5e1941bd84eade9648cd)

Change-Id: If35be0881ad8da4c604ce6683149b15c1a85f289

1 files changed, 51 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/jsr166-tests/src/test/java/jsr166/FutureTaskTest.java b/jsr166-tests/src/test/java/jsr166/FutureTaskTest.java
index baab79e4bc..a5d8c466a1 100644
--- a/jsr166-tests/src/test/java/jsr166/FutureTaskTest.java
+++ b/jsr166-tests/src/test/java/jsr166/FutureTaskTest.java
@@ -8,21 +8,39 @@
 
 package jsr166;
 
-import junit.framework.*;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.NANOSECONDS;
+import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
 import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
 import java.util.concurrent.CancellationException;
 import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
 import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
+import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
+import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
 import java.util.concurrent.Future;
 import java.util.concurrent.FutureTask;
 import java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException;
 import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger;
-import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS;
-import static java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit.SECONDS;
-import java.util.*;
+
+import junit.framework.Test;
+import junit.framework.TestSuite;
 
 public class FutureTaskTest extends JSR166TestCase {
 
+    // android-note: Removed because the CTS runner does a bad job of
+    // retrying tests that have suite() declarations.
+    //
+    // public static void main(String[] args) {
+    //     main(suite(), args);
+    // }
+    // public static Test suite() {
+    //     return new TestSuite(...);
+    // }
+
     void checkIsDone(Future<?> f) {
         assertTrue(f.isDone());
         assertFalse(f.cancel(false));
@@ -122,7 +140,7 @@ public class FutureTaskTest extends JSR166TestCase {
         pf.set(new Object());
         pf.setException(new Error());
         for (boolean mayInterruptIfRunning : new boolean[] { true, false }) {
-            pf.cancel(true);
+            pf.cancel(mayInterruptIfRunning);
         }
     }
 
@@ -473,8 +491,8 @@ public class FutureTaskTest extends JSR166TestCase {
         final PublicFutureTask task =
             new PublicFutureTask(new Runnable() {
                 public void run() {
+                    pleaseCancel.countDown();
                     try {
-                        pleaseCancel.countDown();
                         delay(LONG_DELAY_MS);
                         threadShouldThrow();
                     } catch (InterruptedException success) {
@@ -796,4 +814,31 @@ public class FutureTaskTest extends JSR166TestCase {
         }
     }
 
+    /**
+     * timed get with most negative timeout works correctly (i.e. no
+     * underflow bug)
+     */
+    public void testGet_NegativeInfinityTimeout() throws Exception {
+        final ExecutorService pool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
+        final Runnable nop = new Runnable() { public void run() {}};
+        final FutureTask<Void> task = new FutureTask<>(nop, null);
+        final List<Future<?>> futures = new ArrayList<>();
+        Runnable r = new Runnable() { public void run() {
+            for (long timeout : new long[] { 0L, -1L, Long.MIN_VALUE }) {
+                try {
+                    task.get(timeout, NANOSECONDS);
+                    shouldThrow();
+                } catch (TimeoutException success) {
+                } catch (Throwable fail) {threadUnexpectedException(fail);}}}};
+        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
+            futures.add(pool.submit(r));
+        try {
+            joinPool(pool);
+            for (Future<?> future : futures)
+                checkCompletedNormally(future, null);
+        } finally {
+            task.run();         // last resort to help terminate
+        }
+    }
+
 }