diff options
author | Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com> | 2020-05-27 09:55:41 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Eran Messeri <eranm@google.com> | 2020-05-27 10:59:13 +0100 |
commit | f7fd4fb116d366cc2107f5b4c7c92440898481a6 (patch) | |
tree | 4e8a0af979ba135b04547c20f1523c27326e9964 /services/devicepolicy | |
parent | 20467761276db28cd9786c9341601ef4d9b032a8 (diff) |
Only notify when admin enables location for the user
Only notify the user when the admin enables location services on their
device, not on every state change.
Prior to this change the user would be notified when the admin disables
location services, with a misleading notification indicating apps now
have location available.
Tested by installing TestDPC, setting it as device owner, then toggling
location on and off and observing user is notified only on turning
location on.
Test both legacy and new method flows.
Bug: 156602188
Test: Manual using TestDPC (see above)
Change-Id: Ia757802bd7da1afeecfd8071598b692c69860c66
Diffstat (limited to 'services/devicepolicy')
-rw-r--r-- | services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java | 17 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java b/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java index b7a9ba56c013..8d32d7c970bc 100644 --- a/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java +++ b/services/devicepolicy/java/com/android/server/devicepolicy/DevicePolicyManagerService.java @@ -11951,11 +11951,11 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager { user); mInjector.getLocationManager().setLocationEnabledForUser(locationEnabled, user); - // make a best effort to only show the notification if the admin is actually changing - // something. this is subject to race conditions with settings changes, but those are + // make a best effort to only show the notification if the admin is actually enabling + // location. this is subject to race conditions with settings changes, but those are // unlikely to realistically interfere - if (wasLocationEnabled != locationEnabled) { - showLocationSettingsChangedNotification(user); + if (locationEnabled && (wasLocationEnabled != locationEnabled)) { + showLocationSettingsEnabledNotification(user); } }); @@ -11968,7 +11968,7 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager { .write(); } - private void showLocationSettingsChangedNotification(UserHandle user) { + private void showLocationSettingsEnabledNotification(UserHandle user) { Intent intent = new Intent(Settings.ACTION_LOCATION_SOURCE_SETTINGS) .addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK); // Fill the component explicitly to prevent the PendingIntent from being intercepted @@ -12100,8 +12100,11 @@ public class DevicePolicyManagerService extends BaseIDevicePolicyManager { saveSettingsLocked(callingUserId); } mInjector.settingsSecurePutStringForUser(setting, value, callingUserId); - if (setting.equals(Settings.Secure.LOCATION_MODE)) { - showLocationSettingsChangedNotification(UserHandle.of(callingUserId)); + // Notify the user if it's the location mode setting that's been set, to any value + // other than 'off'. + if (setting.equals(Settings.Secure.LOCATION_MODE) + && (Integer.parseInt(value) != 0)) { + showLocationSettingsEnabledNotification(UserHandle.of(callingUserId)); } }); } |