summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp')
-rw-r--r--security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp559
1 files changed, 470 insertions, 89 deletions
diff --git a/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp b/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp
index 30601538dd..e7c94f37a0 100644
--- a/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp
+++ b/security/keymint/aidl/vts/functional/KeyMintTest.cpp
@@ -56,18 +56,16 @@ using namespace aidl::android::hardware::security::keymint;
template <>
struct std::equal_to<KeyCharacteristics> {
bool operator()(const KeyCharacteristics& a, const KeyCharacteristics& b) const {
- // This isn't very efficient. Oh, well.
- AuthorizationSet a_sw(a.softwareEnforced);
- AuthorizationSet b_sw(b.softwareEnforced);
- AuthorizationSet a_tee(b.hardwareEnforced);
- AuthorizationSet b_tee(b.hardwareEnforced);
-
- a_sw.Sort();
- b_sw.Sort();
- a_tee.Sort();
- b_tee.Sort();
-
- return ((a_sw == b_sw) && (a_tee == b_tee));
+ if (a.securityLevel != b.securityLevel) return false;
+
+ // this isn't very efficient. Oh, well.
+ AuthorizationSet a_auths(a.authorizations);
+ AuthorizationSet b_auths(b.authorizations);
+
+ a_auths.Sort();
+ b_auths.Sort();
+
+ return a_auths == b_auths;
}
};
@@ -182,9 +180,280 @@ struct RSA_Delete {
void operator()(RSA* p) { RSA_free(p); }
};
-/* TODO(seleneh) add attestation verification codes like verify_chain() and
- * attestation tests after we decided on the keymint 1 attestation changes.
- */
+char nibble2hex[16] = {'0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7',
+ '8', '9', 'a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f'};
+
+string bin2hex(const vector<uint8_t>& data) {
+ string retval;
+ retval.reserve(data.size() * 2 + 1);
+ for (uint8_t byte : data) {
+ retval.push_back(nibble2hex[0x0F & (byte >> 4)]);
+ retval.push_back(nibble2hex[0x0F & byte]);
+ }
+ return retval;
+}
+
+X509* parse_cert_blob(const vector<uint8_t>& blob) {
+ const uint8_t* p = blob.data();
+ return d2i_X509(nullptr, &p, blob.size());
+}
+
+bool verify_chain(const vector<Certificate>& chain) {
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < chain.size(); ++i) {
+ X509_Ptr key_cert(parse_cert_blob(chain[i].encodedCertificate));
+ X509_Ptr signing_cert;
+ if (i < chain.size() - 1) {
+ signing_cert.reset(parse_cert_blob(chain[i + 1].encodedCertificate));
+ } else {
+ signing_cert.reset(parse_cert_blob(chain[i].encodedCertificate));
+ }
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!key_cert.get() && !!signing_cert.get());
+ if (!key_cert.get() || !signing_cert.get()) return false;
+
+ EVP_PKEY_Ptr signing_pubkey(X509_get_pubkey(signing_cert.get()));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!signing_pubkey.get());
+ if (!signing_pubkey.get()) return false;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(1, X509_verify(key_cert.get(), signing_pubkey.get()))
+ << "Verification of certificate " << i << " failed "
+ << "OpenSSL error string: " << ERR_error_string(ERR_get_error(), NULL);
+
+ char* cert_issuer = //
+ X509_NAME_oneline(X509_get_issuer_name(key_cert.get()), nullptr, 0);
+ char* signer_subj =
+ X509_NAME_oneline(X509_get_subject_name(signing_cert.get()), nullptr, 0);
+ EXPECT_STREQ(cert_issuer, signer_subj) << "Cert " << i << " has wrong issuer.";
+ if (i == 0) {
+ char* cert_sub = X509_NAME_oneline(X509_get_subject_name(key_cert.get()), nullptr, 0);
+ EXPECT_STREQ("/CN=Android Keystore Key", cert_sub)
+ << "Cert " << i << " has wrong subject.";
+ OPENSSL_free(cert_sub);
+ }
+
+ OPENSSL_free(cert_issuer);
+ OPENSSL_free(signer_subj);
+
+ if (dump_Attestations) std::cout << bin2hex(chain[i].encodedCertificate) << std::endl;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+// Extract attestation record from cert. Returned object is still part of cert; don't free it
+// separately.
+ASN1_OCTET_STRING* get_attestation_record(X509* certificate) {
+ ASN1_OBJECT_Ptr oid(OBJ_txt2obj(kAttestionRecordOid, 1 /* dotted string format */));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!oid.get());
+ if (!oid.get()) return nullptr;
+
+ int location = X509_get_ext_by_OBJ(certificate, oid.get(), -1 /* search from beginning */);
+ EXPECT_NE(-1, location) << "Attestation extension not found in certificate";
+ if (location == -1) return nullptr;
+
+ X509_EXTENSION* attest_rec_ext = X509_get_ext(certificate, location);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!attest_rec_ext)
+ << "Found attestation extension but couldn't retrieve it? Probably a BoringSSL bug.";
+ if (!attest_rec_ext) return nullptr;
+
+ ASN1_OCTET_STRING* attest_rec = X509_EXTENSION_get_data(attest_rec_ext);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!attest_rec) << "Attestation extension contained no data";
+ return attest_rec;
+}
+
+bool tag_in_list(const KeyParameter& entry) {
+ // Attestations don't contain everything in key authorization lists, so we need to filter
+ // the key lists to produce the lists that we expect to match the attestations.
+ auto tag_list = {
+ Tag::BLOB_USAGE_REQUIREMENTS, //
+ Tag::CREATION_DATETIME, //
+ Tag::EC_CURVE,
+ Tag::HARDWARE_TYPE,
+ Tag::INCLUDE_UNIQUE_ID,
+ };
+ return std::find(tag_list.begin(), tag_list.end(), entry.tag) != tag_list.end();
+}
+
+AuthorizationSet filtered_tags(const AuthorizationSet& set) {
+ AuthorizationSet filtered;
+ std::remove_copy_if(set.begin(), set.end(), std::back_inserter(filtered), tag_in_list);
+ return filtered;
+}
+
+bool avb_verification_enabled() {
+ char value[PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX];
+ return property_get("ro.boot.vbmeta.device_state", value, "") != 0;
+}
+
+bool verify_attestation_record(const string& challenge, //
+ const string& app_id, //
+ AuthorizationSet expected_sw_enforced, //
+ AuthorizationSet expected_hw_enforced, //
+ SecurityLevel security_level,
+ const vector<uint8_t>& attestation_cert) {
+ X509_Ptr cert(parse_cert_blob(attestation_cert));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!cert.get());
+ if (!cert.get()) return false;
+
+ ASN1_OCTET_STRING* attest_rec = get_attestation_record(cert.get());
+ EXPECT_TRUE(!!attest_rec);
+ if (!attest_rec) return false;
+
+ AuthorizationSet att_sw_enforced;
+ AuthorizationSet att_hw_enforced;
+ uint32_t att_attestation_version;
+ uint32_t att_keymaster_version;
+ SecurityLevel att_attestation_security_level;
+ SecurityLevel att_keymaster_security_level;
+ vector<uint8_t> att_challenge;
+ vector<uint8_t> att_unique_id;
+ vector<uint8_t> att_app_id;
+
+ auto error = parse_attestation_record(attest_rec->data, //
+ attest_rec->length, //
+ &att_attestation_version, //
+ &att_attestation_security_level, //
+ &att_keymaster_version, //
+ &att_keymaster_security_level, //
+ &att_challenge, //
+ &att_sw_enforced, //
+ &att_hw_enforced, //
+ &att_unique_id);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, error);
+ if (error != ErrorCode::OK) return false;
+
+ EXPECT_GE(att_attestation_version, 3U);
+
+ expected_sw_enforced.push_back(TAG_ATTESTATION_APPLICATION_ID,
+ vector<uint8_t>(app_id.begin(), app_id.end()));
+
+ EXPECT_GE(att_keymaster_version, 4U);
+ EXPECT_EQ(security_level, att_keymaster_security_level);
+ EXPECT_EQ(security_level, att_attestation_security_level);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(challenge.length(), att_challenge.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(challenge.data(), att_challenge.data(), challenge.length()));
+
+ char property_value[PROPERTY_VALUE_MAX] = {};
+ // TODO(b/136282179): When running under VTS-on-GSI the TEE-backed
+ // keymaster implementation will report YYYYMM dates instead of YYYYMMDD
+ // for the BOOT_PATCH_LEVEL.
+ if (avb_verification_enabled()) {
+ for (int i = 0; i < att_hw_enforced.size(); i++) {
+ if (att_hw_enforced[i].tag == TAG_BOOT_PATCHLEVEL ||
+ att_hw_enforced[i].tag == TAG_VENDOR_PATCHLEVEL) {
+ std::string date =
+ std::to_string(att_hw_enforced[i].value.get<KeyParameterValue::dateTime>());
+ // strptime seems to require delimiters, but the tag value will
+ // be YYYYMMDD
+ date.insert(6, "-");
+ date.insert(4, "-");
+ EXPECT_EQ(date.size(), 10);
+ struct tm time;
+ strptime(date.c_str(), "%Y-%m-%d", &time);
+
+ // Day of the month (0-31)
+ EXPECT_GE(time.tm_mday, 0);
+ EXPECT_LT(time.tm_mday, 32);
+ // Months since Jan (0-11)
+ EXPECT_GE(time.tm_mon, 0);
+ EXPECT_LT(time.tm_mon, 12);
+ // Years since 1900
+ EXPECT_GT(time.tm_year, 110);
+ EXPECT_LT(time.tm_year, 200);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Check to make sure boolean values are properly encoded. Presence of a boolean tag indicates
+ // true. A provided boolean tag that can be pulled back out of the certificate indicates correct
+ // encoding. No need to check if it's in both lists, since the AuthorizationSet compare below
+ // will handle mismatches of tags.
+ if (security_level == SecurityLevel::SOFTWARE) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(expected_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED));
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(expected_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED));
+ }
+
+ // Alternatively this checks the opposite - a false boolean tag (one that isn't provided in
+ // the authorization list during key generation) isn't being attested to in the certificate.
+ EXPECT_FALSE(expected_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(att_sw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(expected_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(att_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_TRUSTED_USER_PRESENCE_REQUIRED));
+
+ if (att_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::EC)) {
+ // For ECDSA keys, either an EC_CURVE or a KEY_SIZE can be specified, but one must be.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(att_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_EC_CURVE) ||
+ att_hw_enforced.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE));
+ }
+
+ // Test root of trust elements
+ vector<uint8_t> verified_boot_key;
+ VerifiedBoot verified_boot_state;
+ bool device_locked;
+ vector<uint8_t> verified_boot_hash;
+ error = parse_root_of_trust(attest_rec->data, attest_rec->length, &verified_boot_key,
+ &verified_boot_state, &device_locked, &verified_boot_hash);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, error);
+
+ if (avb_verification_enabled()) {
+ EXPECT_NE(property_get("ro.boot.vbmeta.digest", property_value, ""), 0);
+ string prop_string(property_value);
+ EXPECT_EQ(prop_string.size(), 64);
+ EXPECT_EQ(prop_string, bin2hex(verified_boot_hash));
+
+ EXPECT_NE(property_get("ro.boot.vbmeta.device_state", property_value, ""), 0);
+ if (!strcmp(property_value, "unlocked")) {
+ EXPECT_FALSE(device_locked);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(device_locked);
+ }
+
+ // Check that the device is locked if not debuggable, e.g., user build
+ // images in CTS. For VTS, debuggable images are used to allow adb root
+ // and the device is unlocked.
+ if (!property_get_bool("ro.debuggable", false)) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(device_locked);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_FALSE(device_locked);
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Verified boot key should be all 0's if the boot state is not verified or self signed
+ std::string empty_boot_key(32, '\0');
+ std::string verified_boot_key_str((const char*)verified_boot_key.data(),
+ verified_boot_key.size());
+ EXPECT_NE(property_get("ro.boot.verifiedbootstate", property_value, ""), 0);
+ if (!strcmp(property_value, "green")) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, VerifiedBoot::VERIFIED);
+ EXPECT_NE(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
+ verified_boot_key.size()));
+ } else if (!strcmp(property_value, "yellow")) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, VerifiedBoot::SELF_SIGNED);
+ EXPECT_NE(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
+ verified_boot_key.size()));
+ } else if (!strcmp(property_value, "orange")) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, VerifiedBoot::UNVERIFIED);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
+ verified_boot_key.size()));
+ } else if (!strcmp(property_value, "red")) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, VerifiedBoot::FAILED);
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_EQ(verified_boot_state, VerifiedBoot::UNVERIFIED);
+ EXPECT_NE(0, memcmp(verified_boot_key.data(), empty_boot_key.data(),
+ verified_boot_key.size()));
+ }
+
+ att_sw_enforced.Sort();
+ expected_sw_enforced.Sort();
+ EXPECT_EQ(filtered_tags(expected_sw_enforced), filtered_tags(att_sw_enforced));
+
+ att_hw_enforced.Sort();
+ expected_hw_enforced.Sort();
+ EXPECT_EQ(filtered_tags(expected_hw_enforced), filtered_tags(att_hw_enforced));
+
+ return true;
+}
std::string make_string(const uint8_t* data, size_t length) {
return std::string(reinterpret_cast<const char*>(data), length);
@@ -229,19 +498,20 @@ class AidlBuf : public vector<uint8_t> {
class NewKeyGenerationTest : public KeyMintAidlTestBase {
protected:
- void CheckBaseParams(const KeyCharacteristics& keyCharacteristics) {
+ void CheckBaseParams(const vector<KeyCharacteristics>& keyCharacteristics) {
// TODO(swillden): Distinguish which params should be in which auth list.
- AuthorizationSet auths(keyCharacteristics.hardwareEnforced);
- auths.push_back(AuthorizationSet(keyCharacteristics.softwareEnforced));
+ AuthorizationSet auths;
+ for (auto& entry : keyCharacteristics) {
+ auths.push_back(AuthorizationSet(entry.authorizations));
+ }
EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_ORIGIN, KeyOrigin::GENERATED));
EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_PURPOSE, KeyPurpose::SIGN));
EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_PURPOSE, KeyPurpose::VERIFY));
- // Verify that App ID, App data and ROT are NOT included.
+ // Verify that App data and ROT are NOT included.
EXPECT_FALSE(auths.Contains(TAG_ROOT_OF_TRUST));
- EXPECT_FALSE(auths.Contains(TAG_APPLICATION_ID));
EXPECT_FALSE(auths.Contains(TAG_APPLICATION_DATA));
// Check that some unexpected tags/values are NOT present.
@@ -249,15 +519,13 @@ class NewKeyGenerationTest : public KeyMintAidlTestBase {
EXPECT_FALSE(auths.Contains(TAG_PURPOSE, KeyPurpose::DECRYPT));
EXPECT_FALSE(auths.Contains(TAG_AUTH_TIMEOUT, 301U));
- // Now check that unspecified, defaulted tags are correct.
- EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_CREATION_DATETIME));
+ auto os_ver = auths.GetTagValue(TAG_OS_VERSION);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(os_ver);
+ EXPECT_EQ(*os_ver, os_version());
- EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_OS_VERSION, os_version()))
- << "OS version is " << os_version() << " key reported "
- << auths.GetTagValue(TAG_OS_VERSION)->get();
- EXPECT_TRUE(auths.Contains(TAG_OS_PATCHLEVEL, os_patch_level()))
- << "OS patch level is " << os_patch_level() << " key reported "
- << auths.GetTagValue(TAG_OS_PATCHLEVEL)->get();
+ auto os_pl = auths.GetTagValue(TAG_OS_PATCHLEVEL);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(os_pl);
+ EXPECT_EQ(*os_pl, os_patch_level());
}
};
@@ -270,7 +538,7 @@ class NewKeyGenerationTest : public KeyMintAidlTestBase {
TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Rsa) {
for (auto key_size : ValidKeySizes(Algorithm::RSA)) {
vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
- KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
.RsaSigningKey(key_size, 65537)
.Digest(Digest::NONE)
@@ -280,18 +548,58 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Rsa) {
ASSERT_GT(key_blob.size(), 0U);
CheckBaseParams(key_characteristics);
- AuthorizationSet crypto_params;
- if (IsSecure()) {
- crypto_params = key_characteristics.hardwareEnforced;
- } else {
- crypto_params = key_characteristics.softwareEnforced;
- }
+ AuthorizationSet crypto_params = SecLevelAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::RSA));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
+ << "Key size " << key_size << "missing";
+ EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_RSA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT, 65537U));
+
+ CheckedDeleteKey(&key_blob);
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * NewKeyGenerationTest.Rsa
+ *
+ * Verifies that keymint can generate all required RSA key sizes, and that the resulting keys
+ * have correct characteristics.
+ */
+TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, RsaWithAttestation) {
+ for (auto key_size : ValidKeySizes(Algorithm::RSA)) {
+ auto challenge = "hello";
+ auto app_id = "foo";
+
+ vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
+ ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .RsaSigningKey(key_size, 65537)
+ .Digest(Digest::NONE)
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::NONE)
+ .AttestationChallenge(challenge)
+ .AttestationApplicationId(app_id)
+ .Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED),
+ &key_blob, &key_characteristics));
+
+ ASSERT_GT(key_blob.size(), 0U);
+ CheckBaseParams(key_characteristics);
+
+ AuthorizationSet crypto_params = SecLevelAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::RSA));
EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
<< "Key size " << key_size << "missing";
EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_RSA_PUBLIC_EXPONENT, 65537U));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(verify_chain(cert_chain_));
+ ASSERT_GT(cert_chain_.size(), 0);
+
+ AuthorizationSet hw_enforced = HwEnforcedAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
+ AuthorizationSet sw_enforced = SwEnforcedAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(verify_attestation_record(challenge, app_id, //
+ sw_enforced, hw_enforced, SecLevel(),
+ cert_chain_[0].encodedCertificate));
+
CheckedDeleteKey(&key_blob);
}
}
@@ -304,7 +612,7 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Rsa) {
TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, NoInvalidRsaSizes) {
for (auto key_size : InvalidKeySizes(Algorithm::RSA)) {
vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
- KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::UNSUPPORTED_KEY_SIZE,
GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
.RsaSigningKey(key_size, 65537)
@@ -337,7 +645,7 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, RsaNoDefaultSize) {
TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Ecdsa) {
for (auto key_size : ValidKeySizes(Algorithm::EC)) {
vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
- KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
GenerateKey(
AuthorizationSetBuilder().EcdsaSigningKey(key_size).Digest(Digest::NONE),
@@ -345,12 +653,7 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Ecdsa) {
ASSERT_GT(key_blob.size(), 0U);
CheckBaseParams(key_characteristics);
- AuthorizationSet crypto_params;
- if (IsSecure()) {
- crypto_params = key_characteristics.hardwareEnforced;
- } else {
- crypto_params = key_characteristics.softwareEnforced;
- }
+ AuthorizationSet crypto_params = SecLevelAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::EC));
EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
@@ -383,7 +686,7 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, EcdsaDefaultSize) {
TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, EcdsaInvalidSize) {
for (auto key_size : InvalidKeySizes(Algorithm::EC)) {
vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
- KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::UNSUPPORTED_KEY_SIZE,
GenerateKey(
AuthorizationSetBuilder().EcdsaSigningKey(key_size).Digest(Digest::NONE),
@@ -454,7 +757,7 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, EcdsaAllValidCurves) {
TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Hmac) {
for (auto digest : ValidDigests(false /* withNone */, true /* withMD5 */)) {
vector<uint8_t> key_blob;
- KeyCharacteristics key_characteristics;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> key_characteristics;
constexpr size_t key_size = 128;
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
GenerateKey(
@@ -465,17 +768,10 @@ TEST_P(NewKeyGenerationTest, Hmac) {
ASSERT_GT(key_blob.size(), 0U);
CheckBaseParams(key_characteristics);
- AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced = key_characteristics.hardwareEnforced;
- AuthorizationSet softwareEnforced = key_characteristics.softwareEnforced;
- if (IsSecure()) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(hardwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::HMAC));
- EXPECT_TRUE(hardwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
- << "Key size " << key_size << "missing";
- } else {
- EXPECT_TRUE(softwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::HMAC));
- EXPECT_TRUE(softwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
- << "Key size " << key_size << "missing";
- }
+ AuthorizationSet crypto_params = SecLevelAuthorizations(key_characteristics);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_ALGORITHM, Algorithm::HMAC));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(crypto_params.Contains(TAG_KEY_SIZE, key_size))
+ << "Key size " << key_size << "missing";
CheckedDeleteKey(&key_blob);
}
@@ -600,7 +896,7 @@ TEST_P(SigningOperationsTest, RsaSuccess) {
/*
* SigningOperationsTest.RsaUseRequiresCorrectAppIdAppData
*
- * Verifies that using an RSA key requires the correct app ID/data.
+ * Verifies that using an RSA key requires the correct app data.
*/
TEST_P(SigningOperationsTest, RsaUseRequiresCorrectAppIdAppData) {
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
@@ -1412,7 +1708,7 @@ TEST_P(VerificationOperationsTest, HmacSigningKeyCannotVerify) {
string key_material = "HelloThisIsAKey";
vector<uint8_t> signing_key, verification_key;
- KeyCharacteristics signing_key_chars, verification_key_chars;
+ vector<KeyCharacteristics> signing_key_chars, verification_key_chars;
EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
ImportKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
.Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
@@ -1466,28 +1762,22 @@ class ImportKeyTest : public KeyMintAidlTestBase {
template <TagType tag_type, Tag tag, typename ValueT>
void CheckCryptoParam(TypedTag<tag_type, tag> ttag, ValueT expected) {
SCOPED_TRACE("CheckCryptoParam");
- if (IsSecure()) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(contains(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced, ttag, expected))
- << "Tag " << tag << " with value " << expected << " not found";
- EXPECT_FALSE(contains(key_characteristics_.softwareEnforced, ttag))
- << "Tag " << tag << " found";
- } else {
- EXPECT_TRUE(contains(key_characteristics_.softwareEnforced, ttag, expected))
- << "Tag " << tag << " with value " << expected << " not found";
- EXPECT_FALSE(contains(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced, ttag))
- << "Tag " << tag << " found";
+ for (auto& entry : key_characteristics_) {
+ if (entry.securityLevel == SecLevel()) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(contains(entry.authorizations, ttag, expected))
+ << "Tag " << tag << " with value " << expected
+ << " not found at security level" << entry.securityLevel;
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_FALSE(contains(entry.authorizations, ttag, expected))
+ << "Tag " << tag << " found at security level " << entry.securityLevel;
+ }
}
}
void CheckOrigin() {
SCOPED_TRACE("CheckOrigin");
- if (IsSecure()) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(contains(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced, TAG_ORIGIN,
- KeyOrigin::IMPORTED));
- } else {
- EXPECT_TRUE(contains(key_characteristics_.softwareEnforced, TAG_ORIGIN,
- KeyOrigin::IMPORTED));
- }
+ // Origin isn't a crypto param, but it always lives with them.
+ return CheckCryptoParam(TAG_ORIGIN, KeyOrigin::IMPORTED);
}
};
@@ -2056,6 +2346,107 @@ TEST_P(EncryptionOperationsTest, RsaOaepTooLarge) {
}
/*
+ * EncryptionOperationsTest.RsaOaepWithMGFDigestSuccess
+ *
+ * Verifies that RSA-OAEP encryption operations work, with all SHA 256 digests and all type of MGF1
+ * digests.
+ */
+TEST_P(EncryptionOperationsTest, RsaOaepWithMGFDigestSuccess) {
+ auto digests = ValidDigests(false /* withNone */, true /* withMD5 */);
+
+ size_t key_size = 2048; // Need largish key for SHA-512 test.
+ ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .OaepMGFDigest(digests)
+ .Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
+ .RsaEncryptionKey(key_size, 65537)
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)));
+
+ string message = "Hello";
+
+ for (auto digest : digests) {
+ auto params = AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .Authorization(TAG_RSA_OAEP_MGF_DIGEST, digest)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP);
+ string ciphertext1 = EncryptMessage(message, params);
+ if (HasNonfatalFailure()) std::cout << "-->" << digest << std::endl;
+ EXPECT_EQ(key_size / 8, ciphertext1.size());
+
+ string ciphertext2 = EncryptMessage(message, params);
+ EXPECT_EQ(key_size / 8, ciphertext2.size());
+
+ // OAEP randomizes padding so every result should be different (with astronomically high
+ // probability).
+ EXPECT_NE(ciphertext1, ciphertext2);
+
+ string plaintext1 = DecryptMessage(ciphertext1, params);
+ EXPECT_EQ(message, plaintext1) << "RSA-OAEP failed with digest " << digest;
+ string plaintext2 = DecryptMessage(ciphertext2, params);
+ EXPECT_EQ(message, plaintext2) << "RSA-OAEP failed with digest " << digest;
+
+ // Decrypting corrupted ciphertext should fail.
+ size_t offset_to_corrupt = random() % ciphertext1.size();
+ char corrupt_byte;
+ do {
+ corrupt_byte = static_cast<char>(random() % 256);
+ } while (corrupt_byte == ciphertext1[offset_to_corrupt]);
+ ciphertext1[offset_to_corrupt] = corrupt_byte;
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, Begin(KeyPurpose::DECRYPT, params));
+ string result;
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::UNKNOWN_ERROR, Finish(ciphertext1, &result));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0U, result.size());
+ }
+}
+
+/*
+ * EncryptionOperationsTest.RsaOaepWithMGFIncompatibleDigest
+ *
+ * Verifies that RSA-OAEP encryption operations fail in the correct way when asked to operate
+ * with incompatible MGF digest.
+ */
+TEST_P(EncryptionOperationsTest, RsaOaepWithMGFIncompatibleDigest) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
+ GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .Authorization(TAG_RSA_OAEP_MGF_DIGEST, Digest::SHA_2_256)
+ .Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
+ .RsaEncryptionKey(2048, 65537)
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)));
+ string message = "Hello World!";
+
+ auto params = AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)
+ .Authorization(TAG_RSA_OAEP_MGF_DIGEST, Digest::SHA_2_224);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::INCOMPATIBLE_MGF_DIGEST, Begin(KeyPurpose::ENCRYPT, params));
+}
+
+/*
+ * EncryptionOperationsTest.RsaOaepWithMGFUnsupportedDigest
+ *
+ * Verifies that RSA-OAEP encryption operations fail in the correct way when asked to operate
+ * with unsupported MGF digest.
+ */
+TEST_P(EncryptionOperationsTest, RsaOaepWithMGFUnsupportedDigest) {
+ ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK,
+ GenerateKey(AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .Authorization(TAG_RSA_OAEP_MGF_DIGEST, Digest::SHA_2_256)
+ .Authorization(TAG_NO_AUTH_REQUIRED)
+ .RsaEncryptionKey(2048, 65537)
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)));
+ string message = "Hello World!";
+
+ auto params = AuthorizationSetBuilder()
+ .Padding(PaddingMode::RSA_OAEP)
+ .Digest(Digest::SHA_2_256)
+ .Authorization(TAG_RSA_OAEP_MGF_DIGEST, Digest::NONE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(ErrorCode::UNSUPPORTED_MGF_DIGEST, Begin(KeyPurpose::ENCRYPT, params));
+}
+
+/*
* EncryptionOperationsTest.RsaPkcs1Success
*
* Verifies that RSA PKCS encryption/decrypts works.
@@ -3820,16 +4211,6 @@ TEST_P(AddEntropyTest, AddLargeEntropy) {
INSTANTIATE_KEYMINT_AIDL_TEST(AddEntropyTest);
-typedef KeyMintAidlTestBase AttestationTest;
-
-/*
- * AttestationTest.RsaAttestation
- *
- * Verifies that attesting to RSA keys works and generates the expected output.
- */
-// TODO(seleneh) add attestation tests back after decided on the new attestation
-// behavior under generateKey and importKey
-
typedef KeyMintAidlTestBase KeyDeletionTest;
/**
@@ -3849,7 +4230,7 @@ TEST_P(KeyDeletionTest, DeleteKey) {
// Delete must work if rollback protection is implemented
if (error == ErrorCode::OK) {
- AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced);
+ AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced(SecLevelAuthorizations());
ASSERT_TRUE(hardwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_ROLLBACK_RESISTANCE));
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, DeleteKey(true /* keep key blob */));
@@ -3882,8 +4263,8 @@ TEST_P(KeyDeletionTest, DeleteInvalidKey) {
// Delete must work if rollback protection is implemented
if (error == ErrorCode::OK) {
- AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced);
- ASSERT_TRUE(hardwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_ROLLBACK_RESISTANCE));
+ AuthorizationSet enforced(SecLevelAuthorizations());
+ ASSERT_TRUE(enforced.Contains(TAG_ROLLBACK_RESISTANCE));
// Delete the key we don't care about the result at this point.
DeleteKey();
@@ -3918,7 +4299,7 @@ TEST_P(KeyDeletionTest, DeleteAllKeys) {
// Delete must work if rollback protection is implemented
if (error == ErrorCode::OK) {
- AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced(key_characteristics_.hardwareEnforced);
+ AuthorizationSet hardwareEnforced(SecLevelAuthorizations());
ASSERT_TRUE(hardwareEnforced.Contains(TAG_ROLLBACK_RESISTANCE));
ASSERT_EQ(ErrorCode::OK, DeleteAllKeys());